April Fools Day To Be Moved To 2nd April

Change your calendars

This year, in the UK, April Fool's Day has been moved to 2nd April. This woefully unpublicised decision is set to catch many of the country's pranksters off guard and, perhaps more worryingly, prolong the suffering of prankstees for a further 24 hours.

The decision is tied up with proposed changes to the Bank Holiday system in the UK. Bank Holidays were first introduced in the Bank Holidays Act of 1871. Authored by Sir John Lubbock, a banker with a passion for cricket, he designated official holidays throughout the year based on his home county's village match calendar. In England and Wales these were Easter Monday, Whit Monday, and the 1st Monday in August. In Ireland (still under UK rule at the time), St Stephen's Day was added and in England and Wales, Boxing Day. In Scotland the bank holidays were New Year's Day, Good Friday, 1st Monday in May, 1st Monday in August and Christmas Day. In England, Wales and Ireland, Good Friday and Christmas Day were considered traditional holidays and were therefore not included in the official Bank Holiday list.

Although the Act was repealed in 1971, it was replaced with the Banking & Financial Dealings Act, in which the tradition of bank holidays was continued though some changes were made. The date of the August Bank Holiday was changed from the 1st Monday in August to the last Monday in August, and Whit Monday was replaced by the Late Spring Bank Holiday, fixed as the last Monday in May. In January 2007, the St Andrew's Day Bank Holiday (Scotland) Act 2007 was given royal assent, making 30 November (or the nearest Monday if a weekend) a Bank Holiday in Scotland.

There has since been many campaigns to overhaul the Bank Holiday system in the UK, including plans to establish more public holidays in line with other European countries. In a widely unreported move, and a precursor to further reforms, the Tory government last year approved the scrapping of the May Day Bank Holiday. It will be replaced with two Bank Holidays, one on 1st April and, in England, one on 23rd April (St George's Day) and, in Wales, one on 1st March (St David's Day). An amendment to the Banking & Financial Dealings Act was passed through parliament in September 2014, allowing for the official change to be phased in by 2018, although exactly what "phased in" means is unfortunately unspecified.

The choice of 1st April for the additional Bank Holiday has been chosen due to the moving festival of Easter. The date of Easter, decided by the Council of Nicea in 325 AD, is traditionally taken as the first Sunday after the full moon that occurs on or soonest after 21 March each year, although there are complications with this simple definition. The result is that Easter Sunday can vary by almost a month. In the 21st century, for example, the earliest Easter Sunday is on 23rd March (2008) and the latest on 25th April (2038). In order to give a reasonable spread of Bank Holidays throughout the year (with other anticipated additions), the 1st April was chosen to be near to the median date of Easter and to establish an unmovable date during April.

April Fool's Day has been celebrated for possibly an entire millenium

Government ministers were of course aware of the traditional significance of that date in the UK calendar, and indeed in many other parts of the world. Although there is no official regulation of traditional 'days' such as April Fool's Day (the same is true of Valentine's Day for example), UK authorities have further decided to officially "recognise" April Fool's Day. And in a highly controversial move, and in anticipation of the Bank Holiday change which will become official during 2018, the traditional celebration of April Fool's Day on 1st April has now been shifted to 2nd April as of 2016.

This unpopular and frankly ridiculous decision has been deliberately played down by the government and lost amongst the usual pre-election rhetoric with which the media are now replete. But 1st April pranksters all over the UK are being made to look like fools themselves and are unwittingly performing their stunningly inventive and hilarious japes a whole day too early!

Comments

Victorian Christmas Ghost Stories

An engraving by R. Graves entitled 'The Ghost Story', circa 1870. In his first full-length novel, The Pickwick Papers (1836-1837), Charles Dickens gave us a peculiarly Victorian view of the Christmas tradition. The host of a Yuletide gathering, Mr. Wardle of Dingley Dell, informs his guests that “Everybody sits down with us on Christmas Eve, as you see them now — servants and all; and here we wait, until the clock strikes twelve, to usher Christmas in, and beguile the time with forfeits and old stories”. So begins a long association of the traditional ghost story with Christmas-time; a tradition that has largely died out, but one that should be revived. Of course, the tradition of telling spooky stories at Christmas is much older than Dickens. It was already well-established in the early nineteenth century. In Old Christmas (from The Sketch Book of Geoffrey Crayon, Gent ., 1819), Washington Irving describes a busy Yuletide fireside with the parson “dealing forth strange a

The Fastest Things In The Universe

Gravitational waves can't actually be seen as in this simulation. When gazing at the night sky from here on Earth, it’s easy to picture the Universe as calm and unhurried. But in reality, out there in space, things move fast – really fast. Putting aside particle accelerators and the like, the fastest-moving man-made object was the Helios 2 spacecraft launched in the 1970s. It reached a top speed of 68.75 km/s (153,800 mph) on its mission to the Sun. But this was just a leisurely stroll compared to the fastest things in the Cosmos. So, where do we find the real speed freaks of the Universe? Here’s a run-down of the top five. 1. Expansion of the Universe Speed: Greater than the speed of light! The Universe is expanding. But the Universe isn’t filling up ‘empty space’ as it expands because it is ‘space’ itself which is expanding. Although the laws of physics say that two objects can’t move faster than light speed with respect to each other, there is no such restricti

Black Holes 101

Artist's impression of a black hole. With new blockbuster movie Interstellar now in cinemas, there's a flurry of interest in black holes and wormholes. Theoretical physicist Kip Thorne was a scientific consultant for the production and insisted that the depiction should stay within legitimate boundaries. Apart from the odd bit of artistic license, of course! Black holes are scary, right? They suck in everything in their path. They devour whole planets, stars even, ripping them apart like mere wisps of smoke. They condemn anything that confronts them to an unknowable oblivion. It’s the stuff of nightmare, or at least a bad disaster movie. But I think black holes get a bad press. They are misunderstood, misrepresented. The truth is they are fascinating creatures, if confusing, and not a little bit weird. So, relax for a moment while I give you my quick and dirty guide to black holes. The Black Hole 101, if you like. Let’s start with a simple definition of a black hole

Flat Earth Fallacy

I'm an accepting kind of person. I generally allow people to think what they want, believe what they want and (pretty much) say what they want, within reason. But occasionally an opinion is so far-fetched, insulting or incorrect that it debases human intelligence (all human intelligence, not just mine). And then I feel I must speak up. One such 'opinion' is the belief in a 'flat' Earth. Although this topic has a substantial history (see for example Christine Garwood's Flat Earth: The History of an Infamous Idea ), it has so far not been publicly contested in any great depth. Even Phil Plait, author of the ever-popular Bad Astronomy Blog , declined to give such a preposterous proposition any real air-time. And I don't blame him. It really is the most absurd idea. But it should be denounced, for any number of reasons. The basic premise of the 'flat-Earth' protagonists is that ancient cultures were right, the Earth is flat , a circular disk bo

American's Guide To Pronouncing British Place Names

You all know there's some minor (though understandable) differences between British and American spelling. For example, we have 'colour' for 'color', 'favour' for 'favor' and 'harbour' for 'habor'. We have 'centre' for 'center', 'fibre' for 'fiber' and 'litre' for 'liter'. And so on. These don't usually cause us any problems, especially since they are normally pronounced the same (although with differences in accent, which is an entirely different subject!). But, British spelling idiosyncrasies go far beyond these simple examples, and never more so than in our emotive and quaint place names. British place name spelling is about as intuitive as the 'many worlds' interpretation of quantum mechanics - for the non-scientists among you, that means 'not at all'. Actually, it's not the spelling that's odd (they usually retain a perfectly logical spelling based

Are Indie Authors Destroying The Market?

You're probably aware that we are drowning in an ocean of mediocrity. Yes, I know, there's mediocrity all around us; the TV, the music business, in fact everywhere you care to look. But I'm talking about mediocrity in 'literature', as if that term actually means something these days. Once upon a time, not so long ago, 'literature' was a respectable part of the art world. Authors were mysterious intellectuals, removed from society, tortured souls poring over their foolscap notepads with quill in hand. They were just names, often widely-known ones, like A-list celebrities with no public face, controversy or paparazzi. The authors' agents, dark figures sifting through their ever-growing slush pile of tales, held sway over a global industry from behind locked doors. The authors' publishers were equally elusive, a forbidden realm for those with literary aspirations, with the ability to put their clients names right into the homes of the reading public

Who Was Ghost Story Writer "Mary E. Penn"?

The identity of Mary E. Penn, a late-Victorian author of ghosts stories and crime and mystery tales, is a complete enigma. Scholars of the macabre have been unable to discern any details of her person, origin or character (assuming she was indeed female). We only know that from the 1870s to the 1890s this author published a number of stories in periodicals, most commonly in The Argosy (Ellen Wood’s monthly publication). Some of her early contributions were anonymous (later attributed to Penn in The Wellesley Index to Victorian Periodicals ) and her name only appears from 1878 onwards. Her first story, At Ravenholme Junction , was published anonymously in The Argosy in December 1876, but was later ascribed to Penn on stylistic grounds by eminent supernatural fiction scholar Richard Dalby. Her other ghostly tales were Snatched from the Brink ( The Argosy , June 1878), How Georgette Kept Tryst ( The Argosy , October 1879), Desmond’s Model ( The Argosy , December 1879), Old Vanderhav

Are We Alone In The Universe?

Are these guys hiding at the bottom of your garden? Today, in a rather long blog post, I'd like to speculate a little about the possibility of life existing elsewhere in the Universe. Since I get asked about this topic just about every time I walk into a room, I’d like to tell you what science currently has to say about life in the Universe and what we’re doing to investigate the possibility. The belief that we are not alone in the Universe is of course as old as humankind itself. The idea that there are other worlds populated by other-worldly creatures is a common and natural trait of our species. I think it was an inevitable idea once we had conceived of our own self-identity. But, the concept of life-forms existing elsewhere in the Universe, in the modern scientific sense that we all understand today, is also not new. Many ancient Greek philosophers, including Leucippus, Democritus, Epicurus and Plutarch, were of the firm belief that other worlds existed and some even spec

15 Ways To Make Your Band Believe They Are Going Somewhere

It's a struggle being in a band. You spend all of your spare cash on equipment, room hire and studio time. You spend all your free hours practicing, writing songs, trying to hone your skills and come up with stuff that you are happy with and that you hope other people will enjoy. It's hard work, and often the only return you get is a few people nodding their heads in appreciation of your live set. But, given all this hard work, what do most bands want? They want to be recognised, taken seriously, successful even. And how do they measure that success? By playing sold-out shows? Selling enough merchandise to keep them in guitar strings? Having three people download their EP? Headlining Glastonbury? The measure of success is different from band to band. But, after many years spent in the regional 'music scene' (if there is indeed such a thing), I find it easy to spot those bands that don't have any measure of success (or talent), but make the mistake of trying to g

Is Amazon Ripping-Off Independent Authors?

The advent of indie publishing has had the same effect on writing as streaming has had on music. As a reader, you have a bewildering array of books to choose from, by established as well as back-room authors, from all over the world, in all genres, at all prices, and many for FREE. There's an awful load of rubbish in this global digital slush-pile, but there are also many excellent independent authors writing some top-notch books. That word, used above, - FREE -, is a matter of contention for me. Amazon run an author program called 'Select' which allows authors to discount their books (or make them available for FREE) for up to five days during a 90-day sign-up period. The philosophy is that the spike in downloads increases the book's Amazon ranking (and hence visibility) resulting in more sales once the book returns to its nominal price. Cynical ploy? The disadvantage of the 'Select' program is that you, the author, give Amazon the exclusive right to se

[syn]finity:

Search This Blog