12 Ways To Make Your Music Pants

Lou Reed's 'Metal Music Machine' sucked, but it was meant to!

So, following on from my recent post about the things bands do to make themselves feel they're getting somewhere (bless 'em!), I'd like now to wax lyrical about the things they do that actually make their music suck!

To start though, a little diversion...

A friend of mine manages one of the biggest bands to come out of Manchester in the 90s (I'm not mentioning any names!). This 'man-in-the-know' once recounted to me that he had witnessed a young band starting to create that ubiquitous 'buzz' in the Manchester scene. Word got out that these lads were good, they had an incredible stage show, they really pushed the boundaries. But most enticing of all, they were mysteriously unidentifiable; they wore masks on stage, they didn't have an online presence, they couldn't be contacted. Wow, radical!

Don't ask me how, but word of this great new band (dare I say it, this 'next-big-thing' ) got down to the dollar-heads in the big smoke. Suited execs started jostling each other in bars, racing to Euston whilst clutching their promises of stardom (and its associated biased percentages). They stormed into Manchester to seek out this new thing, this amazing phenomenon hailing from the home of some of the biggest bands in the world.

'So, what happened?', I asked my friend, 'did they make it big?'

'No,' he said, 'it turned out their music was just shit!'

All the hype in the world, all the gimmicks in the world, all the subtle marketing techniques in the world, even all the best contacts in the music bizz that you can nurture, can't help you if your music is pants!

And that brings me to the subject of this post. Who decides whether certain music is pants? You, the band? The music execs? Surely, your fans have a say (if you have any). Sometimes, even you know it's pants, right? And if you're happy with that, and are just having a great time anyway, then I salute you. You'll go far! Well, you won't, but who cares!

But, there are a whole bunch of things that can make your music pants, even if you're confident you do have some fans, and even if you can't admit it to yourself that you suck! So, here's a tongue-in-cheek list of the things many bands do (but not yours of course!) that make their music pants...

1. Buy the cheapest possible equipment, and enough FX boxes to mean you don't actually have to learn to play your instrument at all. Hold on, that was point 10 in 15 Ways To Make Your Band Believe They Are Going Somewhere. Oh well, it must be true...
2. Just write badly. Don't worry about melody, harmony, song structure, key, time signature or tempo or anything like that. You're not in the bloody London Philharmonic for Chrissakes! What the hell is a 'coda' anyway?

3. Keep it simple because you can't expect the public (or indeed yourself) to appreciate, let alone understand, complex musical concepts or experimentation. Under no circumstances attempt a 'tierce de picardie' or 'parallel key modulation' - even if you pull it off you'll still look like a pretentious prat!

4. Just play badly. Don't worry about timing, tightness, tuning, separation or any of those things that so-called 'sound engineers' or (God forbid) 'musicians' harp on about. Just turn it up and move about more... no one will notice!

5. Sound exactly like Oasis, only worse. (In fact, you can substitute any band name here.) It's been done already. We aren't going to fall for it again...

6. Sound exactly different to Oasis, only worse, when in fact you meant to sound exactly like Oasis. Or whoever. There's nothing worse than a bad rendition of something bad!

7. Churn out the same garbage as everyone else. Seriously, the band that were on before you at the gig last night? They were you! In fact, the band on after you? They were you too! So were the headliners! Yawn...

8. Churn out something different to everyone else, but make it garbage anyway. Honestly, do you think adding a trombone solo to that dark metal/ambient trance mash-up section really works? If people are frowning, it's not a good sign, believe me...

9. Get your mate Stu to record your band in his 'home studio' (only you'll have to wait till his Mum's washing has finished its spin cycle), using a couple of battered SM58s, and the free recording software that came with his sister's Toys-R-Us Karaoke set.

10. Get your mate Stu's mate, Ste, to mix your band's recordings for you, using that industry standard production package he got off the back of a packet of Cheerios. Oh, and use some free VSTs too, to really liven up that high end. Not!

11. Get your mate Stu's other mate, Bob, to master your band's tracks, not by subtly playing with the 3D space, the frequency domain, the dynamical content, the nuances of the ambience etc., but just by turning it up so loud the waveform looks like a bar of Cadbury's Bourneville.

12. On no account should you actually compare the quality of your freshly-minted EP to that of a commercially successful band, especially not the band you're trying to sound exactly like, only worse. Hell no, just bang it out there! They'll love it!

Next, try out More Ways To Make Your Band Believe They Are Going Somewhere!

Comments

Victorian Christmas Ghost Stories

An engraving by R. Graves entitled 'The Ghost Story', circa 1870. In his first full-length novel, The Pickwick Papers (1836-1837), Charles Dickens gave us a peculiarly Victorian view of the Christmas tradition. The host of a Yuletide gathering, Mr. Wardle of Dingley Dell, informs his guests that “Everybody sits down with us on Christmas Eve, as you see them now — servants and all; and here we wait, until the clock strikes twelve, to usher Christmas in, and beguile the time with forfeits and old stories”. So begins a long association of the traditional ghost story with Christmas-time; a tradition that has largely died out, but one that should be revived. Of course, the tradition of telling spooky stories at Christmas is much older than Dickens. It was already well-established in the early nineteenth century. In Old Christmas (from The Sketch Book of Geoffrey Crayon, Gent ., 1819), Washington Irving describes a busy Yuletide fireside with the parson “dealing forth strange a

American's Guide To Pronouncing British Place Names

You all know there's some minor (though understandable) differences between British and American spelling. For example, we have 'colour' for 'color', 'favour' for 'favor' and 'harbour' for 'habor'. We have 'centre' for 'center', 'fibre' for 'fiber' and 'litre' for 'liter'. And so on. These don't usually cause us any problems, especially since they are normally pronounced the same (although with differences in accent, which is an entirely different subject!). But, British spelling idiosyncrasies go far beyond these simple examples, and never more so than in our emotive and quaint place names. British place name spelling is about as intuitive as the 'many worlds' interpretation of quantum mechanics - for the non-scientists among you, that means 'not at all'. Actually, it's not the spelling that's odd (they usually retain a perfectly logical spelling based

The Fastest Things In The Universe

Gravitational waves can't actually be seen as in this simulation. When gazing at the night sky from here on Earth, it’s easy to picture the Universe as calm and unhurried. But in reality, out there in space, things move fast – really fast. Putting aside particle accelerators and the like, the fastest-moving man-made object was the Helios 2 spacecraft launched in the 1970s. It reached a top speed of 68.75 km/s (153,800 mph) on its mission to the Sun. But this was just a leisurely stroll compared to the fastest things in the Cosmos. So, where do we find the real speed freaks of the Universe? Here’s a run-down of the top five. 1. Expansion of the Universe Speed: Greater than the speed of light! The Universe is expanding. But the Universe isn’t filling up ‘empty space’ as it expands because it is ‘space’ itself which is expanding. Although the laws of physics say that two objects can’t move faster than light speed with respect to each other, there is no such restricti

Who Was Ghost Story Writer "Mary E. Penn"?

The identity of Mary E. Penn, a late-Victorian author of ghosts stories and crime and mystery tales, is a complete enigma. Scholars of the macabre have been unable to discern any details of her person, origin or character (assuming she was indeed female). We only know that from the 1870s to the 1890s this author published a number of stories in periodicals, most commonly in The Argosy (Ellen Wood’s monthly publication). Some of her early contributions were anonymous (later attributed to Penn in The Wellesley Index to Victorian Periodicals ) and her name only appears from 1878 onwards. Her first story, At Ravenholme Junction , was published anonymously in The Argosy in December 1876, but was later ascribed to Penn on stylistic grounds by eminent supernatural fiction scholar Richard Dalby. Her other ghostly tales were Snatched from the Brink ( The Argosy , June 1878), How Georgette Kept Tryst ( The Argosy , October 1879), Desmond’s Model ( The Argosy , December 1879), Old Vanderhav

Black Holes 101

Artist's impression of a black hole. With new blockbuster movie Interstellar now in cinemas, there's a flurry of interest in black holes and wormholes. Theoretical physicist Kip Thorne was a scientific consultant for the production and insisted that the depiction should stay within legitimate boundaries. Apart from the odd bit of artistic license, of course! Black holes are scary, right? They suck in everything in their path. They devour whole planets, stars even, ripping them apart like mere wisps of smoke. They condemn anything that confronts them to an unknowable oblivion. It’s the stuff of nightmare, or at least a bad disaster movie. But I think black holes get a bad press. They are misunderstood, misrepresented. The truth is they are fascinating creatures, if confusing, and not a little bit weird. So, relax for a moment while I give you my quick and dirty guide to black holes. The Black Hole 101, if you like. Let’s start with a simple definition of a black hole

The Anglo-Saxon/Latin Rule, Again!

It's one of those rules we're often told as writers. Don't write in Latin, write in Anglo-Saxon! This so-called 'rule' has been around quite a while. In Politics & The English Language (1946) George Orwell wrote "bad writers... are nearly always haunted by the notion that Latin or Greek words are grander than Saxon ones". But, what does this mean? Do we have to check the etymology of every word we scribble down in our manuscript books, weeding out the obnoxious foreigners and replacing them with good, solid, stalwart Germanic conciseness? Or does it mean we should write in an archaic style and pepper our prose with lovely words such as erstwhile , forsooth and threap ? Are we banned from using words such as obfuscate , perambulate, egregious and impecunious ? Well, let's think about this for a moment, with a couple of examples. Here's the opening line of Edward Bulwer-Lytton's book Paul Clifford ; It wa s a dark and stormy nig

Flat Earth Fallacy

I'm an accepting kind of person. I generally allow people to think what they want, believe what they want and (pretty much) say what they want, within reason. But occasionally an opinion is so far-fetched, insulting or incorrect that it debases human intelligence (all human intelligence, not just mine). And then I feel I must speak up. One such 'opinion' is the belief in a 'flat' Earth. Although this topic has a substantial history (see for example Christine Garwood's Flat Earth: The History of an Infamous Idea ), it has so far not been publicly contested in any great depth. Even Phil Plait, author of the ever-popular Bad Astronomy Blog , declined to give such a preposterous proposition any real air-time. And I don't blame him. It really is the most absurd idea. But it should be denounced, for any number of reasons. The basic premise of the 'flat-Earth' protagonists is that ancient cultures were right, the Earth is flat , a circular disk bo

Does Today's Music All Sound The Same?

What's wrong Simon? Is this music too interesting? Recently, whilst out shopping, my young son asked "why is all the music in these shops exactly the same?" He had a point. Every neon-illuminated consumer-hovel of fashion we visited was pumping out the same insidious four-to-the-floor musical effluent. There was no variation in rhythm, tempo, timbre or anything else. Absolute tedium. You've heard it said over and over again: "all today's music sounds the same!" It's something that your parents probably say about the music you listen to. Or you say about the music other people listen to. It was probably also something your grandparents said about the music your parents were into. But who is right? Are any of them right? Does today's music really all sound the same? Or is it just generational crankiness? If you're on the ball, you'll already know that the music industry doesn't have your best interests at heart when deciding w

The Date Of Christmas

I've said this many times before, but astronomy effects our daily lives in ways of which we're often unaware. For example, you may be surprised to find that the date of Christmas is almost certainly down to our ancient forebears' astronomical endeavours. Imagine you’re a prehistoric farmer. You would have little understanding of what we today call science. But you would almost certainly know a lot about the motion of the Sun, Moon, stars and planets around the sky. In fact, these motions would be very important to you. Why? Because they mark the passage of the seasons and the seasons dictate what sustenance is available to humankind. Your survival depends on them. If you want your crops to grow, your livestock to survive, your hunt to be a success, you need a good knowledge of where you are in the yearly cycle of life. And it is the skies which give you that knowledge. So, here's the science bit (as people annoyingly say!). In the morning, the Sun rises in the

Are Indie Authors Destroying The Market?

You're probably aware that we are drowning in an ocean of mediocrity. Yes, I know, there's mediocrity all around us; the TV, the music business, in fact everywhere you care to look. But I'm talking about mediocrity in 'literature', as if that term actually means something these days. Once upon a time, not so long ago, 'literature' was a respectable part of the art world. Authors were mysterious intellectuals, removed from society, tortured souls poring over their foolscap notepads with quill in hand. They were just names, often widely-known ones, like A-list celebrities with no public face, controversy or paparazzi. The authors' agents, dark figures sifting through their ever-growing slush pile of tales, held sway over a global industry from behind locked doors. The authors' publishers were equally elusive, a forbidden realm for those with literary aspirations, with the ability to put their clients names right into the homes of the reading public

[syn]finity:

Search This Blog