Skip to main content

The Sun's Closest Neighbour



The Sun’s closest known star was discovered a century ago. But scientists have speculated ever since that an even closer star could be lurking undetected in our immediate neighbourhood.

The search for this hidden star may soon be at an end. If it exists at all, the orbiting WISE telescope, a NASA-funded mission, will already have found it. In fact, one team of researchers have made it a personal goal to claim the discovery for themselves. 

In 1984, scientists discovered that mass extinctions on Earth happen on a regular cycle, every 26 million years or so. They proposed that this was due to periodic comet impacts with our planet. This led some astronomers to suggest that a distant, as-yet-undetected companion star to the Sun is periodically sweeping through the Oort cloud, a vast ocean of comets surrounding the Solar System, each time sending a deadly shower of comets our way. This shower of death, every 26 million years, could explain the regular catastrophic extinctions visible in the fossil record. This mystery star has been called ‘Nemesis’ by some, though others have called it the ‘Death Star’.

The Nemesis hypothesis is now largely out of favour with scientists, mainly because such a distant star would be unable to remain in a stable orbit over a long enough time period to explain the extinction record. Some researchers have also questioned whether all mass extinctions are caused by impact events, or that these do indeed occur periodically. However, many astronomers still agree that a nearby brown dwarf could account for the observed asymmetry in the arrival directions of newly discovered comets. This object (now often referred to as ‘Tyche’), if it exists, won’t be the harbinger of death it once was, but it will nevertheless be an important discovery.

Our nearest stellar neighbour is, currently, an 11th magnitude star known as Proxima Centauri. This insignificant little star appears to be orbiting its parent binary system, Alpha Centauri, at a distance of about 0.21 light years, taking about half a million years to complete its orbit. Best estimates put the distance to Proxima Centauri at 4.2 light years. But the star’s motion through space is bringing it ever closer to us – its closest approach will be in about 26,700 years when it will be within about 3.1 light years of the Sun.

In about 33,000 years, however, another star, Ross 248, will overtake Proxima Centauri to be our closest neighbour. Ross 248 will approach to within 3 light years in about 36,000 years time, but will relinquish the record again to Proxima Centauri about 6,000 years later.

For nearly a century astronomers have searched the skies in vain for a star closer than Proxima Centauri. Even the Hipparcos satellite mission of the 1990s, which measured the distances to millions of stars, only confirmed what we already believed. Interestingly, Hipparcos did discover that one star, Gliese 710, will one day be only 1.3 light years from the Sun, but not for another 1.4 million years! For the moment, we’re stuck with Proxima Centauri.

Of course, just because we haven’t discovered a closer star doesn’t mean there isn’t one. But we can be reasonably sure it isn’t a star like Proxima Centauri or Ross 248. These stars are ‘red dwarfs’ - small, low-mass, and relatively cool stars which are intrinsically very faint. Even the largest red dwarfs have less than 40% of the Sun’s mass and less than 10% its luminosity. Even so, red dwarfs are the most numerous stars in the Milky Way – twenty of the thirty nearest stars to the Sun are red dwarfs, and none of these can be seen with the naked eye!

Although very faint, any red dwarf closer than Proxima Centauri would be easily detectable with modern telescopes. So after a century of fruitless searching, astronomers have concluded that if such a star exists, it must be much dimmer and much cooler than the average red dwarf star.

This is where the WISE telescope comes in. Although of moderate size, WISE is an infrared telescope, specifically designed to look for the faint traces of heat from such cool objects. At the distance of Proxima Centuri, WISE could easily detect a star 100 million times less luminous than the Sun.

Such incredibly dim and cool stars are known as ‘brown dwarfs’. They were first detected in 1995. Now, more than 800 have been found using data from the 2MASS survey, the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the Spitzer Space Telescope, amongst others. WISE itself has found almost 4000 brown dwarfs. 

Brown dwarfs are failed stars - they bridge the gap between giant planets (like Jupiter) and very low mass stars (red dwarfs), their masses lying between about 5 and 90 Jupiter masses. Because of their low mass, their central temperature is not high enough to maintain thermonuclear fusion reactions. It has been shown that brown dwarfs form just like any other star, when a cloud of gas and dust contracts under its own gravity, except that the central star never attains quite enough mass to become a ‘real’ star. Brown dwarfs don’t ‘shine’ in the way normal stars do – they ‘glow’, gradually cooling off by radiating away their internal heat. They are therefore extremely faint, being essentially invisible in optical light, although they can still be detected in the infrared region of the spectrum.

There are three classes of brown dwarf. The warmest, the L dwarfs (1200-2000°C) have clouds of dust and aerosols in their high atmosphere, while the T dwarfs (lower than 1200°C) appear to have methane forming in their atmospheres. The coolest stars of all, the ‘ultra-cool’ Y dwarfs, with temperatures less than about 200°C, have so far not been detected, although some candidates exist. WISE, however, is ideally suited to confirm the first Y-dwarf detection. 

Brown dwarfs bear some similarities with gas giant planets and some similarities with the coolest red dwarf stars, but can’t really be classed as either. While red dwarfs have surface temperatures of more than about 3700°C, brown dwarfs are never hotter than about 2000°C. They are therefore extremely difficult to detect in the optical part of the spectrum. Most of their emission lies in the infrared region. If red dwarfs are the red embers of a dying fire, then brown dwarfs are the smouldering ash.

Most brown dwarfs discovered to date are thought to belong to the coolest known class of brown dwarfs, called T dwarfs. Others belong to the slightly warmer group called L dwarfs. These T and L classes are part of the much larger system of categorising stars according to their temperature; for example, the hottest, most massive stars are the O stars whilst our mid-temperature Sun is a G star. Although very faint, brown dwarfs may be even more numerous than red dwarfs and are easily spotted in WISE data.

WISE, or the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, was a NASA instrument orbiting 500 km above the Earth’s surface. The satellite is in a polar orbit designed so that the telescope always looks away from the Earth and 90° away from the Sun. During each 95-minute orbit WISE took a string of pictures, once every 11 seconds, continuously sweeping out swaths of sky 47-arcminutes wide, or about one-and-a-half times the diameter of the moon. Over the course of six months this band of pictures circled around and eventually mapped the entire sky.

The WISE telescope itself has a diameter of 40cm and contains four infrared detectors each with a million pixels. WISE takes four simultaneous images of the same patch of sky with these four detectors, each tuned to a different infrared wavelength. Because WISE is designed to detect the radiation from extremely cool objects, the detectors must themselves be cooled to prevent them picking up their own ‘heat’ signature. So the entire telescope is housed in an enormous thermos flask and cooled with frozen hydrogen down to about 15 degrees above absolute zero (-258°C). The advanced technology employed means that WISE was hundreds of times more sensitive than its infrared predecessors.

Launched on 14thDecember 2009, WISE was put into space with about nine months supply of frozen hydrogen. Right on cue in October 2010 the supply was finally depleted and the telescope and detectors began to warm up. But this didn’t spell the end of the mission. By the time the coolant ran out the satellite had already surveyed the entire sky about one and a half times and the instrument continued working until early 2011. Astronomers are still sifting through the data years after its primary mission ended. WISE was put into hibernation upon completing its primary mission in 2011. In September 2013, it was reactivated, renamed NEOWISE and assigned a new mission to assist NASA's efforts to identify the population of potentially hazardous near-Earth objects. NEOWISE will also characterize previously known asteroids and comets to better understand their sizes and compositions.

WISE was designed so that brown dwarfs are bright in the second of the instruments four filters. When the telescope makes three-colour images using the three shortest wavelength bands, brown dwarfs pop out as green. Finding these green objects in the reams of WISE images is time consuming. Once a candidate is found, however, the researchers then have to check it isn’t a dust-obscured galaxy often found masquerading as a brown dwarf. Finally they measure the object’s parallax (and so distance) using data from the Hubble Space Telescope, the Spitzer Space Telescope and other ground-based observatories. With its spectacular imaging capabilities and supreme sensitivity, the WISE data is expected to uncover millions of objects never before seen, ranging from near-Earth asteroids to young galaxies more than ten billion light-years away. By October 2010, over 33,500 new asteroids and comets and nearly 154,000 solar system objects were found by WISE.

The coolest brown dwarf WISE discovered has a temperature between -48°C and -13°C. But astronomers believe even colder brown dwarfs exist and they call these ‘Y dwarfs’. None have yet been discovered, but the WISE scientists are convinced it’s only a matter of time. WISE should be able to see a 200°C brown dwarf out to a distance of about 75 light years and brown dwarfs as cool as -120°C out as far as ten light years! With this degree of sensitivity, any brown dwarf closer to the Sun than Proxima Centauri will not go unnoticed by the WISE team. If it's not in the WISE data, it’s probably not worth finding! WISE actually discovered the third nearest star to the Sun, called Luhman 16, at a distance of just 6.6 light years. But other, closer stars may still be hiding in the WISE data. 

Some young brown dwarfs have been discovered to have disks of material around them, perhaps indicating the ability to form planets. So, WISE might not only find the Sun’s nearest star, but it’s nearest planetary system too! That is, once astronomers have finished sifting through their data!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Victorian Christmas Ghost Stories

An engraving by R. Graves entitled 'The Ghost Story', circa 1870. In his first full-length novel, The Pickwick Papers (1836-1837), Charles Dickens gave us a peculiarly Victorian view of the Christmas tradition. The host of a Yuletide gathering, Mr. Wardle of Dingley Dell, informs his guests that “Everybody sits down with us on Christmas Eve, as you see them now — servants and all; and here we wait, until the clock strikes twelve, to usher Christmas in, and beguile the time with forfeits and old stories”. So begins a long association of the traditional ghost story with Christmas-time; a tradition that has largely died out, but one that should be revived. Of course, the tradition of telling spooky stories at Christmas is much older than Dickens. It was already well-established in the early nineteenth century. In Old Christmas (from The Sketch Book of Geoffrey Crayon, Gent ., 1819), Washington Irving describes a busy Yuletide fireside with the parson “dealing forth strange a

American's Guide To Pronouncing British Place Names

You all know there's some minor (though understandable) differences between British and American spelling. For example, we have 'colour' for 'color', 'favour' for 'favor' and 'harbour' for 'habor'. We have 'centre' for 'center', 'fibre' for 'fiber' and 'litre' for 'liter'. And so on. These don't usually cause us any problems, especially since they are normally pronounced the same (although with differences in accent, which is an entirely different subject!). But, British spelling idiosyncrasies go far beyond these simple examples, and never more so than in our emotive and quaint place names. British place name spelling is about as intuitive as the 'many worlds' interpretation of quantum mechanics - for the non-scientists among you, that means 'not at all'. Actually, it's not the spelling that's odd (they usually retain a perfectly logical spelling based

The Fastest Things In The Universe

Gravitational waves can't actually be seen as in this simulation. When gazing at the night sky from here on Earth, it’s easy to picture the Universe as calm and unhurried. But in reality, out there in space, things move fast – really fast. Putting aside particle accelerators and the like, the fastest-moving man-made object was the Helios 2 spacecraft launched in the 1970s. It reached a top speed of 68.75 km/s (153,800 mph) on its mission to the Sun. But this was just a leisurely stroll compared to the fastest things in the Cosmos. So, where do we find the real speed freaks of the Universe? Here’s a run-down of the top five. 1. Expansion of the Universe Speed: Greater than the speed of light! The Universe is expanding. But the Universe isn’t filling up ‘empty space’ as it expands because it is ‘space’ itself which is expanding. Although the laws of physics say that two objects can’t move faster than light speed with respect to each other, there is no such restricti

Who Was Ghost Story Writer "Mary E. Penn"?

The identity of Mary E. Penn, a late-Victorian author of ghosts stories and crime and mystery tales, is a complete enigma. Scholars of the macabre have been unable to discern any details of her person, origin or character (assuming she was indeed female). We only know that from the 1870s to the 1890s this author published a number of stories in periodicals, most commonly in The Argosy (Ellen Wood’s monthly publication). Some of her early contributions were anonymous (later attributed to Penn in The Wellesley Index to Victorian Periodicals ) and her name only appears from 1878 onwards. Her first story, At Ravenholme Junction , was published anonymously in The Argosy in December 1876, but was later ascribed to Penn on stylistic grounds by eminent supernatural fiction scholar Richard Dalby. Her other ghostly tales were Snatched from the Brink ( The Argosy , June 1878), How Georgette Kept Tryst ( The Argosy , October 1879), Desmond’s Model ( The Argosy , December 1879), Old Vanderhav

Black Holes 101

Artist's impression of a black hole. With new blockbuster movie Interstellar now in cinemas, there's a flurry of interest in black holes and wormholes. Theoretical physicist Kip Thorne was a scientific consultant for the production and insisted that the depiction should stay within legitimate boundaries. Apart from the odd bit of artistic license, of course! Black holes are scary, right? They suck in everything in their path. They devour whole planets, stars even, ripping them apart like mere wisps of smoke. They condemn anything that confronts them to an unknowable oblivion. It’s the stuff of nightmare, or at least a bad disaster movie. But I think black holes get a bad press. They are misunderstood, misrepresented. The truth is they are fascinating creatures, if confusing, and not a little bit weird. So, relax for a moment while I give you my quick and dirty guide to black holes. The Black Hole 101, if you like. Let’s start with a simple definition of a black hole

The Anglo-Saxon/Latin Rule, Again!

It's one of those rules we're often told as writers. Don't write in Latin, write in Anglo-Saxon! This so-called 'rule' has been around quite a while. In Politics & The English Language (1946) George Orwell wrote "bad writers... are nearly always haunted by the notion that Latin or Greek words are grander than Saxon ones". But, what does this mean? Do we have to check the etymology of every word we scribble down in our manuscript books, weeding out the obnoxious foreigners and replacing them with good, solid, stalwart Germanic conciseness? Or does it mean we should write in an archaic style and pepper our prose with lovely words such as erstwhile , forsooth and threap ? Are we banned from using words such as obfuscate , perambulate, egregious and impecunious ? Well, let's think about this for a moment, with a couple of examples. Here's the opening line of Edward Bulwer-Lytton's book Paul Clifford ; It wa s a dark and stormy nig

Flat Earth Fallacy

I'm an accepting kind of person. I generally allow people to think what they want, believe what they want and (pretty much) say what they want, within reason. But occasionally an opinion is so far-fetched, insulting or incorrect that it debases human intelligence (all human intelligence, not just mine). And then I feel I must speak up. One such 'opinion' is the belief in a 'flat' Earth. Although this topic has a substantial history (see for example Christine Garwood's Flat Earth: The History of an Infamous Idea ), it has so far not been publicly contested in any great depth. Even Phil Plait, author of the ever-popular  Bad Astronomy Blog , declined to give such a preposterous proposition any real air-time. And I don't blame him. It really is the most absurd idea. But it should be denounced, for any number of reasons. The basic premise of the 'flat-Earth' protagonists is that ancient cultures were right, the Earth is flat , a circular disk bo

Does Today's Music All Sound The Same?

What's wrong Simon? Is this music too interesting? Recently, whilst out shopping, my young son asked "why is all the music in these shops exactly the same?" He had a point. Every neon-illuminated consumer-hovel of fashion we visited was pumping out the same insidious four-to-the-floor musical effluent. There was no variation in rhythm, tempo, timbre or anything else. Absolute tedium. You've heard it said over and over again: "all today's music sounds the same!" It's something that your parents probably say about the music you listen to. Or you say about the music other people listen to. It was probably also something your grandparents said about the music your parents were into. But who is right? Are any of them right? Does today's music really all sound the same? Or is it just generational crankiness? If you're on the ball, you'll already know that the music industry doesn't have your best interests at heart when deciding w

The Date Of Christmas

I've said this many times before, but astronomy effects our daily lives in ways of which we're often unaware. For example, you may be surprised to find that the date of Christmas is almost certainly down to our ancient forebears' astronomical endeavours. Imagine you’re a prehistoric farmer. You would have little understanding of what we today call science. But you would almost certainly know a lot about the motion of the Sun, Moon, stars and planets around the sky. In fact, these motions would be very important to you. Why? Because they mark the passage of the seasons and the seasons dictate what sustenance is available to humankind. Your survival depends on them. If you want your crops to grow, your livestock to survive, your hunt to be a success, you need a good knowledge of where you are in the yearly cycle of life. And it is the skies which give you that knowledge. So, here's the science bit (as people annoyingly say!). In the morning, the Sun rises in the

Are You Really A Bestselling Author?

I've seen a lot of discussion online recently concerning the 'bestseller' or 'bestselling' tag that many authors add to their online persona. There seems to be a general feeling that such tags are often not what they seem, or worse, seem to have no basis in fact. Let me state at the outset that this post is not a criticism of authors who genuinely are 'bestsellers'. To gain such an accolade takes a lot of hard work, dedication and devotion, and would not have been possible if their work were not of a high standard. No, this post is aimed at the author who appears to be making claims that are not substantiated, in the hope of artificially increasing their discoverability, and presumably bolster their sales.  Many authors are desperate to achieve success (usually measured by sales volume), and will often employ underhand tactics to achieve that. This is odd, because there is no evidence that merely making such claims actually improves an author's sa